Geoengineering Is the Real Climate Fight

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

For decades, Americans were told the sky was falling. We were told the ice caps would be gone. We were told the ozone layer was collapsing. We were told Miami would be underwater. Al Gore built an empire on it. Greta Thunberg became a global icon. Billions were raised in the name of “saving the planet.”

Where was the science? Why did so many people just blindly follow this nonsense?

If you care about the environment, I respect that. I grew up in Lake Tahoe. I love clean air, clean water, and wild mountains. I am not anti-environment. I am anti-lying.

Here is the part no one wants to talk about.

While the public was fighting over carbon footprints and paper straws, serious scientists were openly discussing solar radiation management, stratospheric aerosol injection, and deliberate atmospheric intervention.

Not conspiracy theorists. Scientists.

Ken Caldeira of Carnegie Science has publicly organized meetings to discuss what could go wrong if stratospheric aerosol geoengineering were deployed. He has asked scientists to identify “unknown unknowns” related to solar geoengineering risks.

David Keith, a longtime geoengineering researcher now at the University of Chicago, has warned about commercialization risks and governance failures in climate engineering.

These are not fringe voices. These are leading figures in climate systems research.

And they are talking about intentionally altering the atmosphere. That should scare everyone.

---

Weather Modification Is Not Fiction

Let’s go back to something very basic.

The Weather Modification Reporting Act of 1972 exists. It requires reporting of certain weather modification activities to the federal government.

Why pass a law regulating something that does not exist?

Cloud seeding programs are openly documented in western states. My mother, who was always criticized for her “crazy” ideas on this topic was always pointing out to me the anomalies in our weather, citing cloud seeding and chemtrails every time she observed them. Back then I was a teenager who rolled my eyes and would beg her to just enjoy the day without bringing in negative “conspiracies.” Like always, Mom was right. Universities and research institutes, including the Desert Research Institute right here in Nevada, have studied and implemented precipitation enhancement projects. That is public record.

So we need to stop pretending that weather modification is science fiction. It is not.

The real debate is not whether modification research exists.

The real debate is scale, intent, transparency, and oversight.

Are we little rats in their experiment once again? Sure looks like it! Do they care about informed consent? Of course not. Why would the government who ushered in mRNA poison jabs and Operation Warp Speed care at all about telling you what they are doing. They once again, like we saw with fluoride in our water, care very little about science, or the impacts their experimentation games have on you and your families health. The real question is how long are we going to just sit back and let them poison us and do nothing?

---

Public Private Partnerships and the Accountability Gap

Here is where this becomes serious.

Geoengineering research often sits in the gray space between government agencies, defense funding, intelligence research arms, and private foundations.

When projects operate through public private partnerships tied to defense or advanced research channels, ordinary oversight becomes nearly impossible.

That is not how a constitutional republic is supposed to function.

If atmospheric interventions are being researched, tested, modeled, or considered, the public deserves clarity.

What is being tested?
Who authorized it?
What are the environmental and health risk models?
What is the exit strategy?
What is the liability structure if something goes wrong?

If the science is solid, transparency should not be a threat.

If it is harmless, banning it should be easy.

And yet when legislation is introduced to prohibit geoengineering, it faces resistance.

That should make everyone pause.

And for all those who think this isn’t happening, here’s my challenge to you. Pass legislation banning it! If it isn’t happening than your representatives should have no problem with putting in laws that say it’s not happening and can’t happen. If this is all conspiratorial fantasy than let’s ink the deal.

---

This Is Not Left Versus Right

This is not an orange man bad, red vs. blue fight.

This is sovereignty.

If you screamed about fossil fuels poisoning rivers but refuse to ask questions about deliberate atmospheric intervention, you are not defending the planet. You are defending a narrative.

If you marched for climate justice but roll your eyes at geoengineering research, you are picking sides instead of protecting the Earth.

You cannot claim to care about ecosystems while ignoring intentional atmospheric manipulation discussions.

You cannot demand environmental purity while dismissing solar radiation management research as a “conspiracy.”

You do not get to choose which environmental risks are socially acceptable to question.

---

Informed Consent and the Nuremberg Principle

This is where I get very clear.

After World War II, the Nuremberg Code established that human experimentation requires voluntary informed consent.

If atmospheric interventions have global consequences, then every person on Earth becomes a subject.

Even if the intention is benevolent.
Even if the modeling suggests benefit.
Even if the risk is framed as minimal.

Without transparency and consent, it becomes policy imposed from above.

We just lived through what I consider crimes against humanity with the bioweapon that was COVID being unleashed on all mankind and the mRNA “vaccine” roll outs that killed millions. Informed consent was ignored, absolutely eviscerated, and it just happened! You all were there! You should be pissed. You should be awake and angry.

People are not wrong to ask hard questions now.

They are late.

---

The Real Climate Question

If you truly believe in a climate crisis, then geoengineering should terrify you.

Because solar radiation management is not reducing emissions.
It is masking solar input.
It is intervening in atmospheric chemistry.
It carries regional rainfall consequences.
It has documented concerns about monsoon shifts and tropical precipitation patterns in modeling studies.

Even researchers like Caldeira and Keith emphasize unknowns, governance risks, and the danger of premature deployment.

So here is my blunt question.

If you were willing to panic over carbon dioxide and cow farts, why are you not demanding total transparency over atmospheric intervention research?

Why are you not insisting on strict prohibitions and informed consent?

Why are you not funding litigation to force disclosure?

---

The Legal Fight Is Coming

Attorney Tom Renz and a coalition of legal teams are preparing to challenge geoengineering structures through the courts.

This is not about memes.
This is not about social media outrage.

This is about subpoenas.
Discovery.
Depositions.
Documents.

Litigation at this level is expensive. Filing alone can cost millions. Expert witnesses, atmospheric chemists, environmental toxicologists, discovery battles with federal agencies, all of it requires serious funding.

The goal is five million dollars.

Not for yachts.
Not for branding.
For court.

Geoengineering is real folks and the public deserves answers. Your children and their children deserve answers. Your family deserves to be INFORMED.

You can support the legal fight at GiveSendGo.com/RenzLaw and keep an eye on TheGeoFight.com as it launches.

---

Pick a Side, But Pick It Intelligently

You do not have to agree with me politically. This isn’t a political fight.

If you care about environmental integrity, you cannot ignore geoengineering research while screaming about climate change.

If you believe in bodily sovereignty, you cannot shrug at atmospheric experimentation discussions.

If you believe in informed consent, you cannot excuse governance gaps.

This is not about partisan loyalty.

It is about whether citizens have the right to know what is being done to their air, their soil, and their sky.

And if you were loud about global warming but silent about geoengineering, it might be time to ask yourself why and possibly seek a therapist.

The sky deserves better than slogans.

And so do we.

If you value this work and want to support continued investigation and reporting, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Support Your Wellness with MAKE Wellness

I personally use and love MAKE Wellness Bioactive Precision Peptides to support energy, focus, recovery, metabolism, and overall vitality. Peptides help cells operate more efficiently, enhance muscle repair, and improve mental clarity.

👉 Get $10 off orders of $99+ https://makewellness.com/631225/Shopping/Share?promo=give10